Comments on: The Omen (2006)

By: Darren Seeley

Darren Seeley — Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:23:10 +0000

To each his own.

By: Secret Rapture

Secret Rapture — Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:55:04 +0000

My inaugural address at the Great White Throne Judgment of the Dead, after I have raptured out billions! Read My Inaugural Address My Site=http://www.angelfire.com/crazy/spaceman Your jaw will drop!

By: daniel orlando

daniel orlando — Tue, 20 Jun 2006 19:34:07 +0000

i checked the movie the very day it opened
the movie was a kinda ok but it was the same as the old one
so it lacked interest coz i knew the next scene
but the best thing is people are trying to see the original and all the 4 parts
three cheers

By: Scott

Scott — Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:23:52 +0000

Oh, this IS a bad film. Just because it’s technically competent doesn’t mean it’s any good.

By: Darren Seeley

Darren Seeley — Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:23 +0000

I didn’t even notice until you mentioned the post time. That wasn’t intentional. If it was, it would have been 667. Man, I better check in on Emily Rose, and make sure my post time wasn’t around 3am

A true conspiracy theorist, however would note that I was “supposedly” four seconds off. Four. Then they would go by the numrical values shown. I posted on “June 19th, 2006 at 6: 06: 02″. There are four zeroes. They add up to nothing. Which leave two 2′s. 2+2=4. There are also four letters in June. June is the sixth month. The 19th remains unexpained, unless you subtracted the one from the nine. That’s 8. If I have two fours that means…

..nothing.

But I had you goin’, didn’t I?
ha ha ha ha

By: Arjan

Arjan — Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:53:49 +0000

I watched the original last night and I didn’t see why it had to be remade. Anyway: too bad Darren you didn’t post your review 4 secs later. Now it say posted at 6:06:02