Helena Campbell is a girl in the thralls of puberty. Her parents own a circus and when her mother falls ill, Helena blames herself because of the huge fight they had just before her mother collapsed; its subject being Helena’s desire to live a normal life. On the night that her mother is undergoing surgery, Helena is submerged into a metaphorical dream world made up of her own drawings; featuring magical creatures, disappointed books and a comatose queen who requires a charm to be revived, or else this world will be devoured by shadow.
Mirror Mask, is created in unison with the Jim Henson Company, designed and directed by Dave McKean and written by Neil Gaiman from a story idea by Gaiman and Mckean. The film is mostly computer-made. A lot of the sets are digital and most of the actors are digitally altered, but if you’re thinking Sin City right now, you’re very much mistaken. In Mirror Mask often only (parts of) the performers’ faces are used. For instance: the only thing visible of Stephen Fry (who is inspiredly cast as the librarian) is his mouth. The majority of the other performers (digital or otherwise) wear masks and/or have had their faces digitally transfigured.
There is no argument that Mirror Mask is visually stunning. It may very well be one of the most beautiful films you’ll ever see. But it’s all beautiful wrapping; there is a vast emptiness beneath its exterior, due to the very flimsy story at the base of it. And that means that all the pretty pictures before your eyes come to nothing more than filler, their splendour and virtuosity eventually becoming tiresome. The fact that Neil Gaiman is the co-writer of Good Omens, one of the funniest books ever, makes this lack of narrative particularly disappointing. Gaiman can do so much better than he has done here!
This “appearance over content“-approach extends to Stephanie Leonidas, the young actress playing Helena. She was clearly chosen for her good looks (not to mention a mouth that could give Angelina Jolie a run for her money). Leonidas’ acting is as flat at the proverbial dime and she has only one facial expression at her disposal to convey Helena’s turmoil. This is even more annoying since, being unmasked, she is the only one actually using her face. The other actors (including the delectable Mr. Fry) are not visible (long) enough to make a difference.
In a weird way, this film made me want to see Zang Yimou’s Hero again. The first time I watched that movie I was stunned into silence by its visual beauty. To me Hero is chapstick for the soul. The reason I bring this up is that Mirror Mask achieved the opposite in me. Created from a digital world where anything should have been possible, Mirror Mask has only managed to make me irritable. By the time I was more than halfway through (56 minutes into the movie, so don’t say I didn’t give it a go) I had lost patience with it and just did not care where it would lead. Mirror Mask is too much varnish and not enough substance.
Where Hero offers me tranquillity and peace every time I see it, a feeling that is only increased by the storyline, Mirror Mask’s empty vessel feels like a facial scrub that has gone on too long. What should have been soothing and refreshing, has become an unpleasant grinding sensation, and really al you want is for it to stop.
3 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.



RSS 2.0
Mariken (69 posts)
A brilliant movie with actual depth shouldn’t be compared to a visual movie. You’re comparing the work of a highly awarded author to Hero? Pretty colors attract the lowest common denominators of society. I watched people go see Hero and after being restless through the whole movie leave thinking they had done somthing artistic.
Comment by A.Nancy — Mon October 9, 2006 @ 8:55I saw Hero it’s a fine movie if you’re trying to relax and you don’t want to use your brain for a few hours. I’m sure it would look great in HD too.
Neil Gaiman is an expert craftsman of prose, and seeing his work in a visual form is amazing. A true cricism of this movie is that if you do not have some kind of knowledge of literature you could become lost and not get many references.
Stephanie Leonidas does a fine job as well. I have no idea how a 14 year old girl can be such a capable actess. I’m sure the author of this bold criticism was just as amazing an actress at her age if not better. I’m also sure she has improved vastly in all these years of life and has far more acomplishments then the young actress.
The film made me feel like I was stuck in the minds of Salvador Dali and Picasso combined. There are so many eye stimulators that it’s difficult to focus in on only one thing in a single shot. Very artistic and gothy. The young actress did wonderfully. I was amazed by her performance with all the obstacles she had to work with in making her scenes look real. She is extremely talented with exquisite beauty.
Comment by Christina — Mon October 9, 2006 @ 21:02@ A. Nancy: While I do not begrudge you your superiority, I found the tone of your comment a little condescending.
For the record:
I found the lack of content in Mirror Mask annoying particularly because I do read, and have come to expect more of a talented writer like Gaiman. In my opinion a literary reference is not the same as a literary content.
For my money, Hero was in fact a brilliant movie with actual depth.
And yes, I did indeed go to drama school and decided it was not my thing. But I have learned a thing or two about acting, about nuance, and about the difference between speaking loudly and conveying inner turmoil. I may not be able to give an oscarwinning performance, but I am capable of recognizing one (or its opposite).
Having said all that, I love comments like yours, that differ about 180 degrees from my own opinion. The more variety, the more discussion, the better life is! But I would ask you to consider respecting other people’s opinion as much as you demand respect for your own.
Comment by Mariken — Mon October 16, 2006 @ 16:18