After the huge success of Le Fabuleux Destin d’Amélie Poulain (or ‘Amélie’), which seemed the perfect marriage between director Jean-Pierre Jeunet and his star Audrey Tautou, expectations were high for their next collaboration. Again, the typical style that Jeunet showed in Amélie is strongly present and Tautou seems to be in perfect place again. I liked Amélie a lot: I thought it was really original, and it’s safe to say that Jeunet pulled it off again with his latest feature. Nevertheless, this movie left me with a very ambiguous feeling.
There is no denying Jeunet’s craftsmanship: his cinematography is absolutely stunning, the use of colours (although sometimes too prevalent) is beautiful, the camera work and editing is outstanding and original and the world he creates through his colourful characters and dreamlike surroundings is often mesmerising. It’s no wonder millions of people worldwide were seduced by the world Jeunet created with Amélie. These people will not be disappointed, since most of those elements are present here. The atmosphere is less light-hearted this time, as part the story takes place in the trenches during World War I, a particular gruesome war. Jeunet avoids the real horror by showing the fighting in a very detached and clinical way, devoid of all emotion. While these images give a cold, non-political statement, the emotion is explored in the civilian side of the story in which Tautou is searching for her lost fiancée who is presumed dead.
As far as the story goes: it is very complex and I didn’t like the way it was told. In my opinion, Jeunet made too much use of the narrative voice-over. I understand Jeunet stayed very true to the book and I have no problem with voice-overs, however in this case there was too much story told and not enough story acted out. A voice-over should be supportive to the images and role-play, but here it seemed the other way around. I had the feeling the whole book was being read to me and the images were just there to emphasise and colour in the narration. Therefore, I had the impression watching an animated comic book, where most of the fragmented scenes consisted of fast-cut skits to accompany the words. I thought it to be either a lazy way of storytelling or a desperate way to put too much story in too little a space. He should have been much sparser with the voice-over and have more storytelling in the acting.
But there is more. Not only was it too bloody much information, but it was also at too fast a pace. Although my French is quite good, I found watching this without subtitles a very tiring experience. Also native French speakers think it’s too fast and too much. This movie is overly dialogue-driven. So besides the ongoing voice-over we also have the characters constantly spewing all this detailed information which is not always vital to the story. Jeunet likes to elaborately describe all the characters in the movie (even if their importance is very small) which is just too much useless information. The viewer knows nothing more than Tautou’s character, Mathilde, and is therefore obligated to follow this elaborate path of facts and figures. That’s a pity, because it diverts the attention from the real story and turns the intricate plot into the main subject of the movie, leaving the characters and their emotional development out of the equation. It is like watching an architect build a beautiful building, methodically, brick by brick until it is completed, without really showing the beauty of the building, it’s meaning or the aesthetic of the design.
People who have seen Amélie will spot many similarities with this movie and you cannot help but make comparisons between the two. Besides the voice-over and unique visual style, there is again Tautou’s quirky, dreamy character who displays a strong determination to follow her heart. We also see the colourful characters who add the extra flavour and pull the story slightly out of our world, as if it were an alternate reality of our own universe. Since these characters had more recurring roles in Amélie, it was easier to develop a liking to them. In this movie, their performances are just too brief and too numerous, and therefore it becomes a bit annoying. Tautou’s performance is rather similar to the one in Amélie, but she gets pushed away by the intricate plot. What is left is an impressive feat of storytelling and mise-en-scene and many people will fall for what is (again) essentially a simple love story. Nevertheless, it would’ve been better if it concentrated more on the characters and less on the plot.

3 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.



RSS 2.0
paco (89 posts)
I have been wanting to see this one ALL week but didn’t find the time to do so…
your review made me curious, Paco…
Comment by arjan — Mon January 17, 2005 @ 18:01I just watched this on DVD last night and I really enjoyed it. I can’t understand half of your comments, Paco, about too much dialogue and over narration, because the narration sets up some wonderful visual gags. I love the way Mathilde sets off to find her fiancee but introduces us to so many bizarre and interesting characters. Nothing’s ever really grounded in truth, it all plays out like some bizarre fantasy at times, but there’s enough humour and good natire to balance out the darker and more intense aspects of the film. The line Jeunet treads is a dangerous one, but I think for the most part he treads it rather well, not very carefully, but full of gusto and bravado.
The atmosphere I found more similar to The City of Lost Children, rather than Amelie, but Jeunet’s always worth watching as far as I’m concerned (excluding that Alien abomination he was responsible for).
I think you’d do well to watch it again Paco, this tme with subtitles, because a lot of the subtlety and style of the film comes through those worded set ups.
I found this to be a great film and I’d recommend it to anybody.
Comment by Damian — Sun July 17, 2005 @ 9:58Well, I put quite some time in this review to voice my opinion about this movie and I stick by it: it just too much. To me it was like a nice meal which was just too rich with too many spices (and mind you: I like it spicy).
Jeunet didn’t leave any room to breathe and bombarded me with his images, information, multitude of characters and – essentially – useless banter. As a viewer I don’t like to be held firmly by the hand and being led forcefully through a story. I want to be able to roam a bit and make up my own mind about a story.
Then again: I AM appreciative to the beauty in this movie, that’s why I still give it a solid 7/10. It could have been a lot better if I didn’t feel so overwhelmed. A second viewing wouldn’t change that, since I immediately reviewed certain parts afterwards I didn’t get completely the first time, and because it would taint my first impression.
Comment by paco — Mon July 18, 2005 @ 1:08