<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Frankie (2004)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/2004/12/dear-frankie-2004/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/2004/12/dear-frankie-2004/</link>
	<description>Sweet &#038; Salty Movie Reviews!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 10:57:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mariken</title>
		<link>http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/2004/12/dear-frankie-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-32660</link>
		<dc:creator>mariken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/?p=429#comment-32660</guid>
		<description>Arjan, I really don&#039;t think you are giving this movie enough credit. I thought the acting by the four main characters was very very good and I loved how Shona Auerbach let the actors take their time. There were so many uncomfortable moments in this movie that would have been cut short in many other films, I thought her direction (particularly for a first time director) was very brave in that respect. And also I thought that, because she adds all this discomfort and awkwardness, the sentimentality is in fact kept to a minimum. To me this film was actually anyting but a tearjerker because of the soberness and consistency of the colour palette, the well-balanced imagery and the way the actors are allowed to develop their characters. And the little bit of comic relief prevents the film from being top heavy and gives it a ring of truthfulness (my favourite scene is the one where the stranger is sitting in the kitchen and is being eyeballed by Frankie&#039;s grandmother). It handles the subject matter with an air of respect where this easely could have ended up being a &quot;movie of the week&quot; kind of thing. The only thing I disliked was the bit at the end. The semi-happy ending felt forced to me. 
So, I guess it&#039;s true. One either loves or hates this movie. You hated it, I loved it. We are probably both right.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arjan, I really don&#8217;t think you are giving this movie enough credit. I thought the acting by the four main characters was very very good and I loved how Shona Auerbach let the actors take their time. There were so many uncomfortable moments in this movie that would have been cut short in many other films, I thought her direction (particularly for a first time director) was very brave in that respect. And also I thought that, because she adds all this discomfort and awkwardness, the sentimentality is in fact kept to a minimum. To me this film was actually anyting but a tearjerker because of the soberness and consistency of the colour palette, the well-balanced imagery and the way the actors are allowed to develop their characters. And the little bit of comic relief prevents the film from being top heavy and gives it a ring of truthfulness (my favourite scene is the one where the stranger is sitting in the kitchen and is being eyeballed by Frankie&#8217;s grandmother). It handles the subject matter with an air of respect where this easely could have ended up being a &#8220;movie of the week&#8221; kind of thing. The only thing I disliked was the bit at the end. The semi-happy ending felt forced to me.<br />
So, I guess it&#8217;s true. One either loves or hates this movie. You hated it, I loved it. We are probably both right&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

