<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mona Lisa Smile (2003)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/2004/02/mona-lisa-smile-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/2004/02/mona-lisa-smile-2003/</link>
	<description>Sweet &#038; Salty Movie Reviews!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:53:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: weefselkweekje</title>
		<link>http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/2004/02/mona-lisa-smile-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>weefselkweekje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/?p=256#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>Arjan, I guess that since you&#039;re a guy you shouldn&#039;t have gone to this film in the first place. This one has &quot;chick flick&quot; written all over it in big neon letters...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arjan, I guess that since you&#8217;re a guy you shouldn&#8217;t have gone to this film in the first place. This one has &#8220;chick flick&#8221; written all over it in big neon letters&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjan</title>
		<link>http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/2004/02/mona-lisa-smile-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/?p=256#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>well the chick-flick factor isn&#039;t what automatically keeps me away. That is not why I think MLS stank...

I saw some pretty cool chick-flicks... including the Hours...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well the chick-flick factor isn&#8217;t what automatically keeps me away. That is not why I think MLS stank&#8230;</p>
<p>I saw some pretty cool chick-flicks&#8230; including the Hours&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weefselkweekje</title>
		<link>http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/2004/02/mona-lisa-smile-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>weefselkweekje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/?p=256#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>Actually, I never thought of The Hours as a chick-flick. That term is too &#039;Hollywood&#039; for that movie. When I think of chick-flicks I think of movies with a typical, slightly feminist, storyline that&#039;s been designed to make you cry in the end. And there&#039;s always some (succesfull!) romantic plot.

The Hours actually did make me cry, and was a lot more sincere imho than most typical chick-flicks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I never thought of The Hours as a chick-flick. That term is too &#8216;Hollywood&#8217; for that movie. When I think of chick-flicks I think of movies with a typical, slightly feminist, storyline that&#8217;s been designed to make you cry in the end. And there&#8217;s always some (succesfull!) romantic plot.</p>
<p>The Hours actually did make me cry, and was a lot more sincere imho than most typical chick-flicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pip</title>
		<link>http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/2004/02/mona-lisa-smile-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>Pip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/?p=256#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>This chick happened to see &lt;i&gt;Mona Lisa Smile&lt;/i&gt; this afternoon. Thoughts? Well, it actually wasn&#039;t as bad &#039; or as predictable &#039; as expected, with enough to keep me interested and enjoyable enough. I think women will indeed appreciate it more than men. And it&#039;s what I would call &#039;a rainy Sunday afternoon movie&#039;. 

I could also say something about the editing or muddle/undevelopment of sub plots etc but I haven&#039;t the inclination. Other thoughts though... Nice to see a fine British actress in there &#039; Juliet Stevenson CBE (who had us all in tears in &lt;i&gt;Truly, Madly, Deeply&lt;/i&gt;). But a shame she lowered her voice a few octaves to play her lesbian character and had a bad drag queen hairdo to boot. Was great to see Maggie Gyllenhaal in there but I will never be able to look at her in the same light again after seeing her incredible performance in &lt;i&gt;Secretary&lt;/i&gt;.

Finally, Arjan, just reread your review and must admit to absolutely not noticing the Elton John song!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This chick happened to see <i>Mona Lisa Smile</i> this afternoon. Thoughts? Well, it actually wasn&#8217;t as bad &#8216; or as predictable &#8216; as expected, with enough to keep me interested and enjoyable enough. I think women will indeed appreciate it more than men. And it&#8217;s what I would call &#8216;a rainy Sunday afternoon movie&#8217;. </p>
<p>I could also say something about the editing or muddle/undevelopment of sub plots etc but I haven&#8217;t the inclination. Other thoughts though&#8230; Nice to see a fine British actress in there &#8216; Juliet Stevenson CBE (who had us all in tears in <i>Truly, Madly, Deeply</i>). But a shame she lowered her voice a few octaves to play her lesbian character and had a bad drag queen hairdo to boot. Was great to see Maggie Gyllenhaal in there but I will never be able to look at her in the same light again after seeing her incredible performance in <i>Secretary</i>.</p>
<p>Finally, Arjan, just reread your review and must admit to absolutely not noticing the Elton John song!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arjan</title>
		<link>http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/2004/02/mona-lisa-smile-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>arjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/?p=256#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>@ pip
the elton john song is played at the end credits... you know when the pretty roses start to draw (that was a nice touch)

@ weefsel
I guess in some ways the Hours is a chick-flick. But to me being categorized as c-f is not a bad thing per se... The Hours had a very female theme but I absolutely loved it. MLS is a different kind of movie and not even half as good as The Hours...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ pip<br />
the elton john song is played at the end credits&#8230; you know when the pretty roses start to draw (that was a nice touch)</p>
<p>@ weefsel<br />
I guess in some ways the Hours is a chick-flick. But to me being categorized as c-f is not a bad thing per se&#8230; The Hours had a very female theme but I absolutely loved it. MLS is a different kind of movie and not even half as good as The Hours&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pip</title>
		<link>http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/2004/02/mona-lisa-smile-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>Pip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chokingonpopcorn.com/popcorn/?p=256#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>Well, still don&#039;t remember the song. But the credits were great by the way - don&#039;t leave the cinema before they roll...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, still don&#8217;t remember the song. But the credits were great by the way &#8211; don&#8217;t leave the cinema before they roll&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
