Comments on: Love Actually (2003)

By: paco

paco — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Good review! I was thinking of going to see this, but contrary to you the recommendation of Jac Goderie would more of a put-off than a motivation to me

But hell, X-Mas is coming, the decorations are in place so we need a bit of this mushy stuff to get tru the days.

By: reisneus

reisneus — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Jack Goderie, a put-off. I see your point. Nevermind opinion. I was merely referring to his tendency to brutally bury every rom-com. So when he’s positive about a rom-com for once, it catches my attention.

By: Arjan

Arjan — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

I saw it last Tuesday and was somewhat disappointed. First of all some storylines were not finished and I have a feeling the director cit a lot of these storylines while editing the movie. And the problem is all characters were kinda flat… I did really sympathize a lot with them. And Hugh Grant: he can only play one kind of character: Hugh Grant. I don’t see him play something else than a stuttering charming single man. He can’t play a bad guy for instance…

By: Paco

Paco — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Not every character and plotline is succesful in this movie. I thought that Bill Nighy was really hilarious and his expression of love towards his manager was pure gold.

On the contrary, I didn’t like the kid; he was to much of a smart ass. Emma Thompson was great and I didn’t really understand Rowan Atkinson’s role; it was too long for a cameo and too short for a supporting role.